From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: set-frame-position problem(?) Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:16:44 +0100 Message-ID: <4788857C.5020403@gmx.at> References: <47880831.7060202@ig.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200129365 14600 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2008 09:16:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "GNU Emacs \(devel\)" To: Vinicius Jose Latorre Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 12 10:16:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JDcTb-0001pZ-F7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:16:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JDcTD-0007hh-7U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:16:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JDcT4-0007gg-Jk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:15:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JDcT2-0007fC-4a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:15:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JDcT1-0007ex-Sa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JDcT1-00010Q-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:15:51 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2008 09:15:47 -0000 Original-Received: from N741P001.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.129]) [62.47.36.129] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 12 Jan 2008 10:15:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18ertUoPpQeDr1zr1Cb2U/j3V8JR8z62EpQiMOVkK ZS/U8mWgn1DXcu User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <47880831.7060202@ig.com.br> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86771 Archived-At: > I'm not sure if there is a bug/problem with set-frame-position > or if I'm missing something. Does anything change when you apply the following patch? *** frame.c.~1.360.~ Wed Oct 31 20:25:32 2007 --- frame.c Sat Jan 5 20:06:34 2008 *************** *** 4072,4077 **** --- 4072,4078 ---- change the frame size. This is done so that users can create tall Emacs frames without having to guess how tall the tool-bar will get. */ + #if 0 if (toolbar_p && FRAME_TOOL_BAR_LINES (f)) { int margin, relief, bar_height; *************** *** 4093,4098 **** --- 4094,4100 ---- bar_height = DEFAULT_TOOL_BAR_IMAGE_HEIGHT + 2 * margin + 2 * relief; FRAME_LINES (f) += (bar_height + FRAME_LINE_HEIGHT (f) - 1) / FRAME_LINE_HEIGHT (f); } + #endif compute_fringe_widths (f, 0);