From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rng-auto.el seems to be missing from nxml-mode files Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:09:05 +0100 Message-ID: <4786A591.8010301@gmail.com> References: <200801101759.25950.ismail@pardus.org.tr> <47865D07.9040009@gmail.com> <47866342.2080104@gnu.org> <47866711.8030702@gmail.com> <478689A9.1090902@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200006565 4039 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2008 23:09:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 23:09:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?B?SXNtYWlsIETDtm5tZXo=?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 11 00:09:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JD6Ws-0002NA-3g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:09:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JD6WU-0005wt-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:09:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JD6WQ-0005td-Cw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:09:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JD6WO-0005qK-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JD6WO-0005q6-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:09:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JD6WJ-0000AV-5J; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:09:07 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:64927 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JD6WG-0007Gb-8c; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:09:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <478689A9.1090902@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080109-0, 2008-01-09), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JD6WG-0007Gb-8c. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JD6WG-0007Gb-8c 78d19a2909a285d3a3a2a2ba9ed11cb7 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86720 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >> Maybe. I think there must be some reason that JK placed this in a >> hook, but I don't know what it is. >> >> But what about the auto-coding stuff? Did you find some solution to >> that too? Maybe that could be used by html-mode/xml-mode as well? > Maybe I'm mistaken, but I think the auto-coding stuff just duplicates > what is already done in sgml-xml-auto-coding-function. Maybe there are > some improvements we can make to sgml-xml-auto-coding-function based > what nxml does though, so it is worth comparing them before discarding > the nxml version completely. I took a quick look. It does not seem like find-auto-coding uses sgml-xml-auto-coding-function. How is that then handled on file reading? I think nxml-mode checks coding both on reading and writing.