From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; DISPLAY env var bug on w32? Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:28:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4782C394.10509@gmail.com> References: <47827356.70005@gmail.com> <200801072103.m07L3bB7017074@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199752103 11681 80.91.229.12 (8 Jan 2008 00:28:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 08 01:28:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JC2Kh-0004G9-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:28:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC2KK-0001Hp-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC2KG-0001Ev-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC2KC-0001Bz-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC2KB-0001Bw-U8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JC2KB-0003f2-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JC2KB-0008ES-DP for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JC2K8-0003eH-Cs for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:11 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JC2K7-0003ds-2v for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 19:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-148-228.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.148.228]:63631 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JC2K5-0000BA-8B; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 01:28:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <200801072103.m07L3bB7017074@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080107-0, 2008-01-07), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.148.228 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JC2K5-0000BA-8B. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JC2K5-0000BA-8B 4bf914196ab99c36aa56ac25b9be73f4 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86536 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20545 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > This is just a shot in the dark, but can you try to revert server.el to > version 1.136 and see if it works with that? With a little help from Dan (thanks Dan!) I could confirm that it works with version 1.135. But I doubt that reverting something is the right fix. At the moment I wonder if all that need to be fixed is perhaps emacsclient. Why should emacsclient send DISPLAY info to Emacs on w32? There might be reasons that I am not aware of. (I do not remember anything about multiple displays on w32 right now.) If there are, then please see my previous messages about the frame parameters etc. Perhaps is the problem then that the first frame created after "emacs -Q" does not get its frame parameter 'display from the env var DISPLAY?