From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: "Jan Djärv" <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Frame Height Different for Default Frame and Additional Frames]
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:08:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <477F8145.9000605@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <477F6887.60703@swipnet.se>
>>Apparently for Gtk+ users the height changes but the number of visible
>>lines remains the same when toggling `tool-bar-mode'. For native
>>toolbar users the height remains the same and the number of visible
>>lines changes. I reported this only to explain the behavior of Emacs
>>with native toolbars as seen here.
>
>
> Yes this is one of many symptoms of bugs in the Emacs-Gtk+ resize code. Is is
> mainly due to my misunderstanding of both Gtk+ resize handling and Emacs
> resize handling. This time two wrongs did not make one right :-).
Did we already settle on a "right" way to do this? Robert expressed the
desire to keep the number of text lines invariant. ISTR others wanted
the size of the frame on the screen stay invariant. At least a similar
issue was recently brought up for menubars. Finally, I'm interested how
changes of menu-bar-lines/tool-bar-lines are supposed to be applied and
handled - I'm quite lost in this context.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-05 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <002501c8044b$fcc95390$6100000a@intermedinc.internal>
[not found] ` <4701F8AC.6070900@gmx.at>
[not found] ` <E1Iewxc-0004U8-CC@fencepost.gnu.org>
2007-10-08 21:12 ` [Fwd: Frame Height Different for Default Frame and Additional Frames] martin rudalics
2007-10-09 20:02 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-09 21:25 ` martin rudalics
2007-10-10 5:55 ` Jan Djärv
2007-10-10 6:51 ` martin rudalics
2007-10-10 7:39 ` Jan Djärv
2007-10-10 7:50 ` Jason Rumney
2007-10-10 20:41 ` martin rudalics
2007-10-11 6:15 ` Jan Djärv
2007-10-11 8:52 ` martin rudalics
2007-10-11 14:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-10-14 16:29 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-11 5:19 ` Richard Stallman
2007-10-11 8:52 ` martin rudalics
2007-10-11 18:03 ` Jan Djärv
2007-12-25 17:17 ` Richard Stallman
2007-12-27 19:10 ` martin rudalics
2007-12-28 13:56 ` Richard Stallman
2007-12-28 20:06 ` martin rudalics
2007-12-28 23:09 ` Robert J. Chassell
2007-12-28 23:51 ` martin rudalics
2008-01-05 11:22 ` Jan Djärv
2008-01-05 13:08 ` martin rudalics [this message]
2008-01-05 17:33 ` Jan Djärv
2008-01-05 18:08 ` Drew Adams
2008-01-05 22:42 ` Robert J. Chassell
2008-01-05 23:00 ` Jan Djärv
2008-01-06 8:08 ` Richard Stallman
2008-01-06 20:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-01-06 20:45 ` [Fwd: Frame Height Different for Default Frame and AdditionalFrames] Drew Adams
2007-10-10 21:03 ` [Fwd: Frame Height Different for Default Frame and Additional Frames] Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=477F8145.9000605@gmx.at \
--to=rudalics@gmx.at \
--cc=bob@rattlesnake.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jan.h.d@swipnet.se \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).