From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:31:09 +0100 Message-ID: <47396EDD.6020007@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194946343 10478 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2007 09:32:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:32:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 13 10:32:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Irs7y-0006uc-0w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:32:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Irs7l-0000Xl-KE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:32:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Irs7h-0000XP-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Irs7f-0000VZ-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:31:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Irs7f-0000VL-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:31:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Irs7e-0002KU-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:31:54 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2007 09:31:53 -0000 Original-Received: from N830P010.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.47.170]) [62.47.47.170] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 13 Nov 2007 10:31:53 +0100 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+Po/NTPEWP53yZWnDivvEU8gn077x7rk0Qq+Ebrr eWcuWjFIUg3uYm User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83113 Archived-At: >>checkdoc-scan could be far far more efficient. It should scan all ^ `checkdec' will be likely confused more often with `checkdoc'. I think a different term should be used. Also, wouldn't it be reasonable to add `declare-variable' as well? I'm not arguing for consistency here. But we could get rid of comments talking about "byte-compiler warnings" or "pacify byte-compiler". And the intention of some `(defvar variable)'s without such comments would become more clear.