From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags name collision. Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 14:13:46 +0300 Message-ID: <472050e5-8dbc-27bd-3ac6-98d80d8fa838@yandex.ru> References: <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7.ref@Ergus> <20220411124736.3qijvtearh6wlen7@Ergus> <83pmln69n0.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411135259.zqrlngj6lmpgbsni@Ergus> <83ilrf6779.fsf@gnu.org> <20220411142519.vnbr63lfpyuqpw2w@Ergus> <20220412104823.xfquehpmoghektkt@Ergus> <87ilrewp5s.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18666"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Cc: "Alfred M. Szmidt" , eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu , Ergus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 13:14:49 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1neETx-0004fa-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 13:14:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60048 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neETv-000679-QX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:14:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neET4-0004lt-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:13:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]:54795) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1neET1-00076h-Nx; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 07:13:53 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id r64so11717673wmr.4; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 04:13:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0m0TK/bVh4OvwWYL8LP3A9b30iDo8g08z0yyD7VChek=; b=mor3UC3DiakmBKYuXRxZ2RFA4+C1am1gpjbOMTmL6i7YZhbbSuv52cexR6P+rLcKso NuUGhfFqKVfCbUF07htWCijpoMudFjXjgYL3aTUkzuLcgbcy60mHNKXB3oeELojn5IGO LXiETK3e2WsbNyLkI+NWX+P/39HCYRa6CYe0phA2WKn1ILogkEdhMgLBuK1d3toHesDw iJBFKiVj9635wSUF34fub/BntCGk4oHIkMVAwttjLSgutcI2vkRMZe6rcd0P/FmgpDBD xMVUutTbN3VuFXiHhbACFn5f2zmk+PB5UZ5gs/vMGFoh98e0Ve046U3+ceHxUwGCbW2o PN4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0m0TK/bVh4OvwWYL8LP3A9b30iDo8g08z0yyD7VChek=; b=e6FYkd0GfUIFxi/79LTbne4D8KjvgndyZasHb2DyO5PEHOnIAsSlzbpjOJ9AJEGRYM ViAWxBPUJHmmMDcg5E7gGqR7I/Vjx2U0tig4rOYCfr3uC63394ai91F8fmxOQ9WevQTE f6sY/TEmRV+tnVPE1Jj5bMRpWyoOg/s2BmI0UVNEXjsqypoJr/sG+b144fqLqmgXlIqZ eYVv5mcWn28ZW7h4oot+Cx7sOjGqjJBliIgAQotFoSRV5I2aSt5+rXS/VEdSJuJ4txZy R6Nw0lVSQIh/7uy+oEVfDO/A3EafL+skApwY8xfzCZF8KZnIjpEuVznnOg2Q3cDAa7gP sXGA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VW9PablHOs7RVnDdk55+MQXroNcNGOe4luGYqB3pjo6gVmyB0 FxKCgFXKBaz+/+gd+YXTizQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6+vx2j9VGPpOGcMZjvnG01d7YFKJhBoaMJ92YDRFeAivWT3n83myZzYjbowFQU/v5LtwcHA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2904:0:b0:37b:ea53:4cbf with SMTP id p4-20020a1c2904000000b0037bea534cbfmr3612996wmp.46.1649762029588; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 04:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i4-20020a05600c354400b0038e9c5924d6sm2234502wmq.29.2022.04.12.04.13.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Apr 2022 04:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87ilrewp5s.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32a; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288287 Archived-At: On 12.04.2022 13:51, Po Lu wrote: > Ergus writes: > >> I use OpenBSD in my servers daily and all my team around use vim and >> neovim with Universal Ctags with no issue. Universal ctags can generate >> emacs tags, json, legacy and modern ctags, xref... if there is some >> problem the right to do is to open an issue in their project... > vim and neovim are not vi and mg, and are not standardized utilities > either. Are you saying vi or mg, as opposed to vim and neovim, cannot work with the tags output by universal ctags?