From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confusing in NEWS Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:43:36 +0200 Message-ID: <4719DBD8.3020708@gmx.at> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192877459 4910 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2007 10:50:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 20 12:50:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IjBv0-0004SY-NJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 12:50:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjBut-0007cC-7t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:50:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjBup-0007aA-Ls for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjBum-0007YW-JS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjBum-0007YT-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:50:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjBul-00061X-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2007 10:50:42 -0000 Original-Received: from N838P001.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.48.161]) [62.47.48.161] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 20 Oct 2007 12:50:42 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19z89NAyTxzExzF4FBI01HHDBb5oRYrVPXeZBBKv7 y4KbHujUcp/ysS User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81291 Archived-At: > NEWS in Emacs 22 contains something like this > > ** The command `repeat' no longer attempts to repeat a command bound > to an input event. > > but I don't understand it. What is "a command bound to an input > event" intended to mean? For instance, consider `forward-word'. It > is bound to the input event C-f, and C-x z does repeat it. My bad. We could write ** The command `repeat' no longer attempts to repeat commands bound to input events represented as lists. but maybe we shouldn't mention the change at all. I added the entry only to make sure that people won't get surprised by the new behavior.