From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Manual policy (Re: Emacs-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 65)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:07:58 +0100
Message-ID: <470D4D3E.3030603@gnu.org>
References: <20071010211743.5104873931@grelber.thyrsus.com>
	<20071010214419.GA1297@thyrsus.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1192054119 3393 80.91.229.12 (10 Oct 2007 22:08:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:08:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: esr@thyrsus.com
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 11 00:08:37 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IfjjI-00082I-UU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:08:37 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IfjjD-00067E-5V
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:08:31 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ifjin-0005nY-Uq
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:08:05 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ifjim-0005lQ-1P
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:08:05 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ifjil-0005lG-TZ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:08:03 -0400
Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jasonr@gnu.org>) id 1Ifjil-0001PW-Ml
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:08:03 -0400
Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108])
	by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C76E950EDE; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:08:02 +0100 (BST)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
In-Reply-To: <20071010214419.GA1297@thyrsus.com>
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80553
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/80553>

Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> So it's only been over a year since the last point release.  I'm not 
> hugely reassured.
>   

I'm not sure why stability is seen as such a bad thing these days,
especially for a revision control tool.