From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vinicius Jose Latorre Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question about byte-compiler warning Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:35:06 -0300 Message-ID: <46FA8A3A.9020702@ig.com.br> References: <46F92B6F.2000101@ig.com.br> <46F95896.4090509@ig.com.br> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190824461 7800 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2007 16:34:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:34:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "GNU Emacs \(devel\)" To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 18:34:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IaZpu-00074z-27 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 18:34:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaZpq-0003kB-S4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaZnQ-0000Mg-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:31:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaZnO-0000Jc-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaZnN-0000J1-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:31:29 -0400 Original-Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.229]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IaZnN-0003Bs-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:31:29 -0400 Original-Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s7so1663020wxc for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:31:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=TeNMVto9moDNB9h19TH0ANoPV7LyTVaA3y01xDnOWbw=; b=uqNdmG+/NRw4k6z9aR6IBe+tbfmm4QsDGy+Dq6nh5D1vhrNs53cE2Ei0w6DawrLERTQaS3zheSB5uoQkgioTGtirxN+VwVGtR3sWh0I87Af3AGmqUL1NdrTq1naRDMpwcXtmszwKbQzIGneUVWreENAY0DRsQLoDEOCudOX+dgs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=qEeRlas3YGX2Zvn74lLJddWav+yOzii/ptncNoDKSJ8Nu0SLC0DivbiiwRVC5xZ8suACK9xA59DvhaZVlfCpciLkMQ933Kz6WDGE+/nU2Sa3N0rG6aXrYIdrDJqBx/1ZuBrGfXiM6GZU/09De0FDKmx2ubur4dfZKZEjWHKjw9E= Original-Received: by 10.90.115.9 with SMTP id n9mr829896agc.1190824287970; Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?192.168.0.100? ( [201.82.130.22]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b12sm946058ana.2007.09.26.09.31.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:31:26 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070802 SeaMonkey/1.1.4 In-Reply-To: X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79922 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> (eval-and-compile >> (cond >> ((featurep 'xemacs) ) >> (t )))) >> >> It could also be used as an alternative construction. >> > > eval-and-compile is ugly. > Yep, it's ugly, but it works, that is, no warning.