From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug of display-table & make-glyph-code Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:52:59 +0200 Message-ID: <46E262EB.60502@gmx.at> References: <200708271732.22306.zslevin@gmail.com> <46DD9F41.8090700@gmx.at> <46DE63EE.3070509@gmx.at> <46DE7DBA.90408@gmx.at> <46DEE8AB.9050203@gmx.at> <46DFBF17.4010702@gmx.at> <7utzq71c7s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <46E105A2.4000609@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189243914 19655 80.91.229.12 (8 Sep 2007 09:31:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 09:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 08 11:31:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITwfN-0003IT-T5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:31:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITwfL-0000k9-N5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:31:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITwe4-0008HA-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:30:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITwe2-0008FY-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:30:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITwe2-0008F9-FY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:30:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITwe1-0002gE-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:30:26 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Sep 2007 09:30:24 -0000 Original-Received: from N842P001.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.49.33]) [62.47.49.33] by mail.gmx.net (mp043) with SMTP; 08 Sep 2007 11:30:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18fiXNVT4sfodTQUxrPvgh2LqA31Nie9DRtWSENrC fc0u5m3x0Udn/B User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78249 Archived-At: > Well, an incompatible change only in a default, and a change for the > better, IMO. Though changing faces does seem to be a minefield. :( Some of the mines are due to changing the `font-lock-comment-face' default for Emacs 22. > If you wanted to be ultra-cautious, just fix the bug in 22, and change > to warning in the trunk? There's no obvious fix. Using `font-lock-comment-delimiter-face' would have to be documented as well and I would have to cross two minefields then ...