From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: QUERY: w32 sub process implementation Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:18:31 +0100 Message-ID: <46CAADE7.5050902@gnu.org> References: <46C8B346.8020408@gnu.org> <87odh1p9ed.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187687947 26263 80.91.229.12 (21 Aug 2007 09:19:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 21 11:19:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1INPtA-0006Uh-BT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:19:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INPt9-0004Y0-H0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:19:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INPt3-0004Sq-5B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INPsz-0004HA-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:18:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INPsy-0004Gc-T6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:18:52 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1INPsv-0004cw-Le; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:18:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5EE50FCE; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 10:18:45 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) In-Reply-To: <87odh1p9ed.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76876 Archived-At: Kim F. Storm wrote: > However, the current implementation of sys_select is sub-optimal and > doesn't support all the features of make-network-process (e.g. > non-blocking connects), so fixing the code as suggested would be > really good. > > Does W95/98/ME have a working winsock2 implementation? > Yes. Cleaning up sys_select to use winsock2 and file handles together in one select statement can be done separately from async IO. Once that is taken care of, I think the missing features can be added.