From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What happens when I evaluate the call the second time? Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:32:51 +0200 Message-ID: <468A5E13.8070204@gmail.com> References: <7dbe73ed0707030245t1fc73075hae75d19aac485562@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1183473201 24315 80.91.229.12 (3 Jul 2007 14:33:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 14:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eric Lilja , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Mathias Dahl To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 03 16:33:18 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I5jRO-0008CR-1U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:33:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5jRL-0001Vq-6S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:33:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5jRH-0001QI-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I5jRE-0001Fo-U0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I5jRE-0001FX-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I5jRE-000157-DV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-133-189.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.133.189]:64265 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1I5jRA-00052H-6N; Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:33:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070604 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000753-2, 2007-07-03), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.133.189 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1I5jRA-00052H-6N. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1I5jRA-00052H-6N f4064f28c4c937a0bf75232ba97b110a X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:74241 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > "Mathias Dahl" writes: > >>> First C-x C-e after the function, then twice after calling it. The >>> output is: >>> average >>> 2 >>> 2 (#o2, #x2, ?\C-b) >>> >>> Now what's the (#o2, #x2, ?\C-b) stuff? >> Different ways to express 2 I think. What I find strange however, is >> that it is only displayed at the second invocation of C-x C-e. > > It's a feature, see eval-expression-print-format. I think the thing Erik is asking about is why the output is different in the second evaluation.