From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jpff Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; RMAIL reading of mail file Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:17:23 +0000 Message-ID: <4681-Sun10Feb2008121723+0000-jpff@codemist.co.uk> References: <8724-Thu07Feb2008164605+0000-jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk> <18350.404.929683.328844@rgrjr.rgrjr.dyndns.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202645918 21440 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2008 12:18:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:18:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Bob Rogers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 13:19:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOB9A-0007oB-GX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:19:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOB8h-0002y8-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:18:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOB83-0002bh-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOB80-0002YS-An for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOB7z-0002YE-US for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOB7z-0003t6-N8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JOB7z-00035Y-AI for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOB7v-0003sK-Tw for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:46 -0500 Original-Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.142]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOB7v-0003qD-Id for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:17:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [217.155.197.248] (helo=west.codemist.co.uk) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JOB7m-0007Vi-D6 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:17:34 +0000 Original-Received: from cardew.codemist.co.uk ([172.16.4.17]) by west.codemist.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JOB7j-0006Hr-NC; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:17:31 +0000 Original-Received: from jpff by cardew.codemist.co.uk with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JOB7c-0001o1-6t; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 12:17:24 +0000 X-Mailer: emacs 22.1.1 (via feedmail 8 I) In-reply-to: <18350.404.929683.328844@rgrjr.rgrjr.dyndns.org> (message from Bob Rogers on Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:40:04 -0500) X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [217.155.197.248] X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88622 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20982 Archived-At: Sorry for delay -- your IP address in the the abuse list and so was filed as junk X-Warning: 98.216.94.251 is listed at rbl-plus.mail-abuse.ja.net >> I wonder, how much RAM do you have on this system? 4Gb When I was tracing the operation what I notices was that it has found a \033 character, and that triggered a call to detect_coding_iso_2022 on line 7379 on src/coding.c The detect_coding_iso_2022 looks at all the remaining characters of the file as far as i could see, via ONE_MORE_BYTE (c); switch (c) That seemed to get almost to the end of the file (end?) and then return. The main scan started again until the next \033 when the whole procedure was repeated, scanning to the end. I can confirm that the 118mins is repeatable, and emacs 22 did the same in 8secs You can have my RMAIL file if necessary -- not sure there is much sensitive in it. Or I could send snapshot values from gdb investigations. BTW do you work on rmail in general? There is a long standing bug with reading mail from two places in the the same g command ==John ffitch