From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Saving markup formats Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:46:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4675C7D6.4010604@gmail.com> References: <871wgi9jzb.fsf@jidanni.org> <87odjlwpu1.fsf@jurta.org> <87ir9r1m99.fsf@jurta.org> <87myz2i9tj.fsf@jurta.org> <87r6ocx0tk.fsf_-_@jurta.org> <87vedmtnsz.fsf@jurta.org> <87vedmnvaf.fsf@kanga.tapsellferrier.co.uk> <4675A519.202@gmail.com> <87r6oafdkf.fsf@jurta.org> <87sl8qnrme.fsf@kanga.tapsellferrier.co.uk> <4675B791.6060006@gmail.com> <87ps3unqpf.fsf@kanga.tapsellferrier.co.uk> <4675BD78.5010508@gmail.com> <87hcp6nphl.fsf@kanga.tapsellferrier.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1182124007 1568 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2007 23:46:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 23:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Oliver Scholz , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nic James Ferrier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 18 01:46:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I04S7-0007T5-PA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:46:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I04S7-0005mK-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:46:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I04S4-0005mF-Lx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:46:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1I04S3-0005m3-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:46:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1I04S3-0005m0-5b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:46:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1I04S2-000503-LH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:46:34 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-133-189.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.133.189]:64133 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1I04Rz-0003pz-6T; Mon, 18 Jun 2007 01:46:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070604 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <87hcp6nphl.fsf@kanga.tapsellferrier.co.uk> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000750-0, 2007-06-18), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Originating-IP: 83.254.133.189 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1I04Rz-0003pz-6T. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1I04Rz-0003pz-6T bf2c1943289feca64f0149fd64de14b9 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:73195 Archived-At: Nic James Ferrier wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >>> Only when the specification of the action is available in the schema. >> Eh, yes. The result should fit into the schema, of course. > > It's not just that. A word processor might have non-schema defined > constraints on a document. How is that? Do you mean that a document following the schema might not be valid as a word processor document? That is clearly a messy state, isn't it? What about standardization committées view of this? >> But nothing prevents you from doing more complex things. Insert first >> result, check completion again etc. > > Sure. Maybe that is more powerful than I'm giving it credit for. > > But it's too difficult because it's not a DOM. > > If it weren't too difficult people (me?) would have already done a lot > of this stuff. Could you give me a more concrete example of what you want to do? (Or did you give that before?)