From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?] Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:16:21 +0100 Message-ID: <4669C725.4040708@gnu.org> References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <864plnorgn.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <85ps4ap0kh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <18023.8888.790251.607253@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <4667AAD8.5040502@swipnet.se> <18024.20333.913034.347754@localhost.localdomain> <4668EF09.9020405@swipnet.se> <87ps46zziq.fsf_-_@ambire.localdomain> <466966E4.2080405@ig.com.br> <54E15C20-6585-49FF-9F47-8692687525EE@gnu.org> <4669BA0B.2020300@gnu.org> <1720BB55-6794-4B47-81C6-4BBFC8B5A73B@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181337400 18897 80.91.229.12 (8 Jun 2007 21:16:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 21:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 08 23:16:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hwloy-0000Ui-UD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:16:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwloy-00020s-GS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:16:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwlou-000205-9Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:16:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwlos-0001yJ-No for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:16:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hwlos-0001yG-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hwloq-0006J1-83; Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403B15008E; Fri, 8 Jun 2007 22:16:27 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) In-Reply-To: <1720BB55-6794-4B47-81C6-4BBFC8B5A73B@gnu.org> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72516 Archived-At: Ken Raeburn wrote: > That may be it. It looks like it'll support the port-number-selected > TLS protocols, SSL? > but I don't see how it would support ones where use of TLS is > negotiated by the application protocol after the connection is established It effective handles all network traffic by passing it through gnutls or openssl. The former at least should handle TLS as well as SSL.