From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Icon displayed wrong Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 00:18:14 +0100 Message-ID: <464F85B6.1030106@gnu.org> References: <92odkh9za2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <464ECB33.1050102@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1179616710 3892 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2007 23:18:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 23:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, cloos@jhcloos.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 20 01:18:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HpYBv-0005q6-C6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2007 01:18:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpYBu-0001jx-Od for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpYBr-0001js-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:18:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpYBp-0001id-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpYBo-0001iX-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpYBm-0001NH-By; Sat, 19 May 2007 19:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAF350006; Sun, 20 May 2007 00:18:17 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:71407 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > Is the inconsistency in icon style visible in the version that will be > Emacs 22.1? Does it look bad? > The prerequisites for hitting this bug are: 1. No XPM support or a monochrome display. 2. User has set the Emacs.tool-bar.attributeForeground XResource to something other than black. Point 1 limits the potential audience of the bug to people with X on a monochome display, and Windows users without the xpm image library. I don't know how many of the first group exist but I think it will be very small, and the process for setting XResources is sufficiently difficult on Windows that anyone capable of doing that is surely capable of downloading and installing xpm libraries. In trying to reproduce this bug, I saw another bug that makes the tool-bar icons inconsistent regardless of whether we replace these icons or not. Changing the foreground of the tool-bar face in .emacs does not take effect for the icons that are displayed when Emacs starts. Likewise when a user uses customize-face to change the tool-bar face, only tool-bar icons that have not yet been displayed are affected.