From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: when emacs 22.1 release will ready? Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4635C41F.8060103@gmail.com> References: <259495020704291337s35dd584fi3b7ef1dd511b11d4@mail.gmail.com> <4635B7F9.8090909@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177928751 10732 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2007 10:25:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 30 12:25:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HiT4n-00026e-2E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:25:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiTAx-0007Jm-IV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiTAt-0007Gw-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiTAr-0007C7-Q0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiTAr-0007Bv-NL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:32:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HiT4g-00030I-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64793 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HiT4c-0005v0-5a; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:25:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000737-0, 2007-04-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HiT4c-0005v0-5a. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HiT4c-0005v0-5a 2fb06b660343805bfb4b9d248a7ad2be X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70405 Archived-At: joakim@verona.se wrote: > Another useful method is getting bug-reporters to supply unit tests > for their bugs. > > If some unit-testing frameworks, like > http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/UnitTesting, where included in > emacs, maybe the bug-reporting template in emacs could suggest writing > a unit test for the bug when reporting it. A very good idea in my opinion.