From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: html-mode demanding a bit too tight Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:41:06 +0200 Message-ID: <46326DF2.5040005@gmail.com> References: <87647ooxwm.fsf@zip.com.au> <462CC030.8030203@gmail.com> <87mz0y8vyk.fsf@zip.com.au> <4631DB16.6030408@gmail.com> <853b2mgi3v.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <4631E354.3040201@gmail.com> <85tzv2f2uj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <4631E68A.3000801@gmail.com> <85lkgef1na.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177710079 8387 80.91.229.12 (27 Apr 2007 21:41:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 27 23:41:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HhYBo-00080S-7l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:41:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhYHg-0006YN-N0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:47:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhYHd-0006YH-Ab for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:47:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HhYHa-0006XV-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:47:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HhYHa-0006XN-Pw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:47:14 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HhYBg-00010D-D1; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:41:08 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:59387 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HhYBd-0006wI-8p; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:41:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <85lkgef1na.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000736-2, 2007-04-26), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HhYBd-0006wI-8p. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1HhYBd-0006wI-8p 7e58a840e131edc097b5a7b4293a7f68 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70292 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > I wrote "get it fixed", not "fix it". If you are bothered by a > problem, it is your problem to get it fixed, by whoever. Yes, I saw you wrote "get it fixed". But even that is a collaborative effort. > Tough, but hardly world-shattering. No, but maybe impossible in some situations. Collaboration is of course a big win/necessity for a huge project. It does not come for free however. Majority vs minority questions will always have to be tackled to avoid long term difficulties.