From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Stephen.Berman@gmx.net: Re: redisplay] Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:58:26 +0200 Message-ID: <46303F82.90805@swipnet.se> References: <462F6ABA.6030808@swipnet.se> <462F9E30.4000702@swipnet.se> <20070426.044422.158290364.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177567181 19836 80.91.229.12 (26 Apr 2007 05:59:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 05:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 26 07:59:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hgx10-0002Nt-Nh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:59:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgx6h-00007E-UQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgx6d-000074-Vy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:05:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgx6b-00006o-Jk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hgx6b-00006l-Dj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 02:05:25 -0400 Original-Received: from av11-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net ([81.228.8.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hgx0r-0008Lo-SZ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:59:30 -0400 Original-Received: by av11-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 434AC382BF; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:59:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av11-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222BA37EB2; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:59:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (81-235-205-78-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.78]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A6B37E4E; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:59:25 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070221) In-Reply-To: <20070426.044422.158290364.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70164 Archived-At: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu skrev: >>>>>> On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:30:08 +0200, Jan Dj=E4rv said: >=20 >>> Yes, you are right. It would also require to run redisplay >>> directly on the Expose event. >=20 > But Lisp evaluations might occur during redisplay (unless > inhibit-eval-during-redisplay is non-nil), and thus it's not safe to > do so in general. When SYNC_INPUT is on we are not handling X events in the signal handler=20 anymore. Isn't Lisp evaluations safe then? Why not? Reentrance-problem= s? Jan D.