From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22 branch created. Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:44 +0200 Message-ID: <462DEE9C.1020106@gmail.com> References: <87d51uletj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <462DE900.4090703@gmail.com> <462DED57.8020600@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177415349 31917 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2007 11:49:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 24 13:49:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgJW5-0002Aa-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:49:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgJba-0001hH-RD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:54:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgJbX-0001fs-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgJbV-0001fg-39 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:54:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgJbU-0001fd-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:54:40 -0400 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgJVy-0000aV-8g; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:61611 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HgJVw-0005cM-7h; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:48:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070326 Thunderbird/2.0.0.0 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <462DED57.8020600@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000735-2, 2007-04-23), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HgJVw-0005cM-7h. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1HgJVw-0005cM-7h d54fa0da8116cc22b87b7bc7fdee4936 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69923 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Leo wrote: >>> If I do "cvs up -r EMACS_22_BASE" how should I then >>> continue fetching updates from the CVS? Is this ok then? : >>> >> >> I would also like to know. >> > > "cvs up" is sufficient to keep the working copy up to date. The -r > option is "sticky", which means that once you've used it once, it is > automatically assumed in future on that working copy. Thanks for your very clear answer, Jason.