Re: should query-replace-regexp-eval be in the manual?

["Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>]

David Kastrup wrote:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> 
>> Basically it has been my experience that query-replace-regexp-eval
>> is a nice idea, but in practice quite unusable.  \, achieves a
>> similar purpose but with a much more convenient interface.
> 
> To get back to the original question: since \, has all of the
> functionality of query-replace-regexp-eval with a more convenient
> interface, query-replace-regexp-eval could be considered obsolete or
> at least obscure.
> 
> Since we tell people how to do the same thing more flexibly with \, I
> don't think that query-replace-regexp-eval deserves a place in the
> manual.  It would be a lot of additional explanation without any
> conceivable benefit to the user.

After reading this I think it would be a good idea to tell in the doc 
string for query-replace-regexp-eval to use query-replace-regexp + \ 
instead.