From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs WIN32 crashes on reinitialzing of lisp process using slime Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:54:08 +0200 Message-ID: <461F6F60.4010007@gmx.at> References: <461EAF08.1050202@gnu.org> <461EB54F.40909@gnu.org> <461F53FE.9000800@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1176465135 6075 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2007 11:52:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:52:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , carstenblaauw@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 13:52:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HcKK5-0006Xg-5d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:52:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKOL-0000tp-CJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:56:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKOI-0000t8-73 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:56:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKOG-0000sq-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HcKOG-0000sn-Lq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:56:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HcKJz-0002E3-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2007 11:52:06 -0000 Original-Received: from N740P003.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.36.99]) [62.47.36.99] by mail.gmx.net (mp053) with SMTP; 13 Apr 2007 13:52:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/8CgQxfXj8diWXYv7gQ7vDJDS2nCkYFHsNL86BSy 9jLd04npKFMGJL User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en In-Reply-To: <461F53FE.9000800@gnu.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69383 Archived-At: > I don't know. I couldn't reproduce it by setting a kill-buffer-hook that > calls kill-buffer, so it must be specific to the way it is done by slime > (using a process-sentinel rather than kill-buffer-hook). kill-buffer has a window of opportunity before it sets buffer-name to nil. Could you try reproducing the slime crash with the patch I sent to emacs-pretest?