From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:18:37 +0100
Message-ID: <4610139D.3060909@gnu.org>
References: <f7ccd24b0702281427y48b034e7r1a80baffed362acb@mail.gmail.com>	<jwvwt1vzks9.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1HQUEQ-0005iY-U8@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvk5xmv6sm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1HQvdW-0007G3-Ie@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HTACo-0003Q9-5f@fencepost.gnu.org>	<E1HTGvP-0005NP-UP@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HVgGK-00072z-KG@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<! !
	!	E1HVjWy-00068P-Ei@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HVyOM-0001Le-H0@fencepost.gnu.org>	<E1HVzaL-0005qI-GV@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HWEki-0007Bx-Lf@fencepost.gnu.org>	<E1HWM2F-0005P5-TL@etlken.m17n.org>	<E1HWwcA-0000bQ-L3@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvlkhgjai5.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<E1HXOYv-0000nE-TI@fencepost.gnu.org>	<jwvodmatfpy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<umz1t7mlo.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HXmsS-0000zY-Ea@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<uvegg6ba1.fsf@gnu.org>	<E1HY0ab-0006mw-LE@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvps6nx62r.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175458745 11485 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2007 20:19:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:19:05 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org,
	handa@m17n.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 01 22:19:02 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HY6Vw-0006no-Ex
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:19:00 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HY6Yt-0007IV-BY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:22:03 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HY6Yp-0007Fy-Qv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:21:59 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HY6Ym-00078m-0f
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:21:59 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HY6Yl-00078V-Rc
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:21:55 -0400
Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jasonr@gnu.org>)
	id 1HY6Vm-0005e5-5c; Sun, 01 Apr 2007 16:18:50 -0400
Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108])
	by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EAE5C502F6; Sun,  1 Apr 2007 21:18:47 +0100 (BST)
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
In-Reply-To: <jwvps6nx62r.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68897
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/68897>

Stefan Monnier wrote:
> There's no indication that doing it right (i.e. doing the coding-system
> decoding somewhere in the w32 code which turns w32 events into elisp events)
> is difficult.  AFAICT nobody has really tried to do it.
>   

Anything to do with coding-systems in C code is difficult. Especially 
when almost every encoding on Windows involves autoloaded CCL based 
coding-systems.