From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local? Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:57:07 +0200 Message-ID: <460E3E83.3080408@gmail.com> References: <460DB19B.30102@gmail.com> <460E25B2.3050001@gmail.com> <460E38DF.9060807@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175338644 26369 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2007 10:57:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:57:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 31 12:57:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXbGm-0004mB-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:57:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbJZ-0000DH-FG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:00:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbJP-0008Sw-On for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:59:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbJO-0008PA-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:59:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbJN-0008On-MJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 05:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HXbGZ-0002XE-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:62139 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HXbGX-0006DH-59; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:57:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000729-1, 2007-03-30), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HXbGX-0006DH-59. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HXbGX-0006DH-59 f2688362c0fd3ab59b2d71ae386515f9 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68831 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > >> Can you see any way it can be erased by kill-all-local-variables before it >> should? > > There is no way to interactively cause kill-all-local-variables to be > executed between two calls to undo without breaking the undo chain, > thereby causing pending-undo-list to be reset by the next undo (via > undo-start). Are you sure this true even if kill-all-local-variables are called from post-command-hook or from a timer? If so can you please explain to me why?