From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] autorevert.el -- revert fix for Windows platform Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:11:51 +0000 Message-ID: <46050777.4090403@gnu.org> References: <7it9frhi.fsf@cante.net> <87slbx9vcf.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4602A730.8030408@gmail.com> <4602C1A1.50300@gnu.org> <3b3vsw76.fsf@cante.net> <46043A5D.7000702@gnu.org> <46045D95.3000501@gnu.org> <460502E0.8030507@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174734728 26394 80.91.229.12 (24 Mar 2007 11:12:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jari Aalto To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 24 12:12:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HV4AC-00041h-J7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:12:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV4CC-0000bb-TA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:14:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HV4CA-0000bW-CE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HV4C8-0000bK-U0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HV4C8-0000bH-RR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 06:14:00 -0500 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HV4A7-0002mu-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214BD50002; Sat, 24 Mar 2007 11:11:55 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) In-Reply-To: <460502E0.8030507@gmx.at> X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68462 Archived-At: martin rudalics wrote: > Doesn't this > > (defun auto-revert-tail-handler () > (let ((size (nth 7 (file-attributes buffer-file-name))) > ... > (when (> size auto-revert-tail-pos) > ... > (insert-file-contents file nil auto-revert-tail-pos size))) > (undo-boundary) > (setq auto-revert-tail-pos size) > ... > > suffer from the buffer-size file-size dichotomy as well? Or are we on > the safe side here? No. buffer-size is not used, both auto-revert-tail-pos and size are measuring bytes in the file, not characters in the buffer.