From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Remove delete-overlay? Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:47:20 +0100 Message-ID: <45E5F868.7000108@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172699265 24043 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 21:47:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:47:45 +0000 (UTC) To: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 22:47:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMWe6-0000Il-3G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:47:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMWe7-0001Ux-4N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:47:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMWdt-0001TM-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMWdr-0001RL-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMWdr-0001Qp-8n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HMWdq-0006dp-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:60573 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HMWdp-0006h4-3p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:47:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000719-0, 2007-02-28), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HMWdp-0006h4-3p. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HMWdp-0006h4-3p 025f7c663035fabbe6c8e0a8aa5223bd X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67073 Archived-At: I have some times looked at the doc string for delete-overlay to convince myself that the overlay is not deleted by delete-overlay. It is just removed from the buffer. The doc string does not tell that part of the story however. It would be nice if it did. Perhaps the function should be called remove-overlay instead since it just removes the overlay from the buffer. But my English is to weak to tell if this is better. And delete-char deletes an "a" but "a" continues to exist and I find nothing strange about that ...