From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: vertical scrollbar error on MS Windows Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:54:14 +0100 Message-ID: <45E5EBF6.5080101@gmail.com> References: <030d01c75b73$9fb5b1c0$8144fe91@j4f3n1> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172696089 2848 80.91.229.12 (28 Feb 2007 20:54:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:54:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: grischka Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 28 21:54:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HMVon-0003Rg-Ge for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:54:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVoo-0004NR-9V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:54:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVod-0004NL-IK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVoc-0004MQ-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HMVoc-0004MM-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.212]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HMVoZ-00068Y-5f; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:60087 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HMVoX-0005WH-4f; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:54:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 In-Reply-To: <030d01c75b73$9fb5b1c0$8144fe91@j4f3n1> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000719-0, 2007-02-28), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HMVoX-0005WH-4f. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1HMVoX-0005WH-4f bf985de6bcbb1c0b75e644231cf83791 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67067 Archived-At: grischka wrote: > Yes, not bad. Aside from personal preference, I'm all pro > to keep up variety in GUI culture. As long as it is very easy to change (just a few seconds for the user for simple things, a some minutes for more complicated things) it is good. When it takes longer I doubt that variety in GUI is that good. But I believe it is possible to have big variation with such boundaries. But it takes work to bring things together.