From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: font-locking and inhibit-field-text-motion
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:04:13 +0100
Message-ID: <45E480AD.5080800@gmx.at>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172603373 2031 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 19:09:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:09:33 +0000 (UTC)
To: emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 20:09:23 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HM7hJ-0002uo-3F
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:09:13 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HM7hI-0007w6-Qf
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:09:12 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HM7h7-0007vM-FX
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:09:01 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HM7h5-0007uP-KO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:09:00 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM7h5-0007uB-8K
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:08:59 -0500
Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HM7h4-0000Jb-Px
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:08:58 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2007 19:08:57 -0000
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18IaM9E/IYIwIoKR++rmI/cbL9aoiCq/Oj1cDeDMS
	25kw==
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66939
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/66939>

I noticed that neither font-lock's `save-buffer-state' nor jit-lock's
`with-buffer-prepared-for-jit-lock' bind `inhibit-field-text-motion'.
Yet both, font-lock and jit-lock, use `line-beginning-position'.

Just a casual, probably paranoid observation.  I don't use fields.