unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: "Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:42:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45E2E3AC.6050300@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m33b4tz05r.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>

 > So it seems plain stupid to release it with a setting that will impact
 > and annoy users and cause a support burden after the release.

While I agree with all of David's arguments (and even add the one that
a buffer tail is stealthily refontified after every single buffer change
followed by 16 secs idleness) I'm afraid that setting this to nil won't
remove any support burden.  Many major modes still work better when they
are allowed to fontify a buffer from beginning to end.

Also, when a mode uses font-lock to assign `syntax-table' properties,
there's a slight chance that an editing sequence that worked with
stealth fontification turned on will not work any more when stealth
fontification is turned off.  Having fontification assign syntax-table
properties is certainly flawed by design but at the moment there's no
other way to do that automatically.

With other words, setting this to nil may cause some obscure bugs get
reported (and hopefully fixed) earlier ...

martin, who has stealth fontification turned off ever since

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-26 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-25 12:13 Default of jit-lock-stealth-time David Kastrup
2007-02-25 13:31 ` martin rudalics
2007-02-25 22:29 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26  3:27 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26  4:56   ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26 19:52     ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 20:14       ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27  7:39         ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-27 20:43           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28  7:27             ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-28 20:36               ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-01  8:14                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-01 15:18                   ` Stefan Monnier
2007-03-01 15:56                     ` David Kastrup
2007-03-01 16:00                       ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-03-01 16:54                     ` Stuart D. Herring
2007-03-01 16:57                       ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2007-03-01 17:00                         ` Stuart D. Herring
2007-03-01 17:13                           ` David Kastrup
2007-03-02  1:59                             ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-03-03 13:22                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-03 13:36                     ` David Kastrup
2007-03-03 15:10                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-03 15:24                         ` Daniel Brockman
2007-03-03 15:43                           ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04  2:00                           ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-03 15:37                         ` David Kastrup
2007-03-03 23:18                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-04  8:16                             ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04 13:29                         ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04 20:59                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-03-04 21:13                             ` David Kastrup
2007-03-07  1:05                               ` Miles Bader
2007-03-07  4:50                                 ` David Kastrup
2007-03-07  5:01                                   ` Miles Bader
2007-03-07 21:44                                     ` David Kastrup
2007-03-05  2:55                           ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-05  7:18                             ` David Kastrup
2007-03-04  2:00                     ` Richard Stallman
2007-03-04  8:42                       ` David Kastrup
2007-03-05  2:55                         ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 21:33       ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27  8:17       ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 20:48         ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28  2:37         ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-28  2:37         ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26  7:16   ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 19:53     ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-27  8:19       ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26  4:39 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26  7:11   ` Romain Francoise
2007-02-26  7:35     ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 10:20       ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-26 10:43         ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 10:56           ` Andreas Schwab
2007-02-27  7:38             ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-27  8:31               ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 11:00               ` David Kastrup
2007-02-28  2:37                 ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-26 11:26           ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-26 11:28             ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 14:56               ` Juanma Barranquero
2007-02-26 12:13             ` Jan Djärv
2007-02-26 10:24       ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26 13:42         ` martin rudalics [this message]
2007-02-26 14:26           ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26 16:32             ` martin rudalics
2007-02-26 15:10           ` David Kastrup
2007-02-26 15:22             ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26 16:44               ` martin rudalics
2007-02-26 22:55                 ` Kim F. Storm
2007-02-26 19:56       ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-26 21:34         ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-26 23:19           ` Miles Bader
2007-02-27  0:43             ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27  2:10               ` Miles Bader
2007-02-27  4:57                 ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27  8:23                   ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 20:54                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 20:59                       ` David Kastrup
2007-02-27 21:19                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 22:02                           ` David Kastrup
2007-02-28  4:42                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28  6:35                               ` David Kastrup
2007-02-28 20:33                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-28  7:27                           ` Richard Stallman
2007-02-28 20:39                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2007-02-27 23:21                         ` Stefan Monnier
2007-02-27  4:22           ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45E2E3AC.6050300@gmx.at \
    --to=rudalics@gmx.at \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=storm@cua.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).