From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?B?SmFuIERqw6Rydg==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:13:45 +0100 Message-ID: <45E2CEF9.2010700@swipnet.se> References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172492111 30959 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 12:15:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 13:15:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLekw-0005Cu-FC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:15:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLekv-00066b-S5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLekg-000637-CY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:14:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLekc-0005yA-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:14:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLekc-0005xl-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:14:42 -0500 Original-Received: from av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net ([81.228.9.180]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HLeka-0006Wu-FC; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 07:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: by av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 70E5438CD3; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:14:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.102]) by av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F10338B10; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:14:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from husetbladh.homeip.net (81-235-205-78-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.78]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299EB37E4F; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:14:37 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66847 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero skrev: > On 2/26/07, David Kastrup wrote: > > I don't have an opinion about the setting of the variable, but FWIW > I'm in Andreas' boat: I have it at default value, and I've never > noticed any ill effect. I have the default as well. I have noticed that Emacs can take some CPU when it "should" be idle. However, for the most part, I can't say I noticed any ill effects either. > >> This is particularly noticeable if the noise level of your system >> depends on the CPU load (like increased fan usage). >> >> Would you be likely to notice this on your system? > > Not at work's machine, but definitely on my home's laptop. And I > didn't notice it (not that it didn't happen, but if it *did* happen it > wasn't much of an issue). I notice increased fan noice at work. > > Perhaps a better metric would be: do you always have lots of buffers? > I don't. Most of the time I have perhaps two or three (non-special) > buffers open. I tend to quickly close any buffer I'm not working on. I usually have something like 50-200 buffer. Reloading the desktop is not very fast :-) Jan D.