From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fundamental-mode-hook Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:44:19 +0100 Message-ID: <45CBA7C3.6000606@gmail.com> References: <45CA70FA.6020002@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170974712 32289 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2007 22:45:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:45:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 23:45:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFI0n-00047Z-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:45:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFI0m-0002do-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFI0B-0002Jy-Ff for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HFI0A-0002JQ-1v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:44:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HFI09-0002J8-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:44:25 -0500 Original-Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net ([80.76.149.213]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HFI07-0008BM-BS; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64005 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HFI05-00048J-85; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 23:44:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000712-1, 2007-02-08), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1HFI05-00048J-85. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1HFI05-00048J-85 eced7c3534714f3c82dd9dab59b5910c X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66139 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > Each major mode should have a normal "mode hook" named > `MODENAME-mode-hook'. > > fundamental-mode does not have such a hook. > > Fundamental mode is an exception to many of these conventions. > I will update the manual. I thought a fundamental mode hook was a good solution to the problem that there is no "new buffer" hook. But a special hook would perhaps be better.