From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Image autodetection Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:04:27 +0000 Message-ID: <45BF0A1B.70202@gnu.org> References: <878xflr6vd.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170147891 14031 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2007 09:04:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 30 10:04:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HBov2-0002Gc-5D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:04:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBov1-0004vB-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:04:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HBouo-0004tz-5U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:04:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HBoum-0004tV-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:04:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HBoum-0004t0-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HBoum-000634-3S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from outmail1.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.237]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HBoul-000577-GI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 04:04:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD3351DED; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:04:30 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65617 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero wrote: > The only advantage of the image-minor-mode method is that users would > receive a security warning when they first run image-toggle-display > (because it would be disabled). There's no reason that image-mode could not do the same.