From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New pretest tarball 22.0.93 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:19:54 +0100 Message-ID: <45B651CA.2020905@gmail.com> References: <87hcuia6c4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <45B6105D.2020302@gmail.com> <45B62C29.7090606@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169576415 31442 80.91.229.12 (23 Jan 2007 18:20:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 23 19:20:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H9QFg-0005Ei-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:20:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9QFg-00042a-2u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H9QFT-00041a-7d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:19:59 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H9QFR-00040t-Hl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:19:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H9QFR-00040q-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:19:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.213] (helo=ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H9QFP-0001MB-8P; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:19:55 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64393 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H9QFN-0003GY-7F; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:19:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: <45B62C29.7090606@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000705-3, 2007-01-23), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H9QFN-0003GY-7F. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1H9QFN-0003GY-7F b83172d5472270d372abf1878239aa5f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65421 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: >> I have uploaded new unpatched (unofficial) binaries compiled from CVS >> some hours ago (after the new pretest tarball was released): > Why not upload binaries that are built from the pretest sources? I have it all setup for automatic fetching-building-uploading of what I upload now. And I thought that someone else would probably upload binaries built from the tarball. The value with my uploads are perhaps that they are done frequently (most of the time).