From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-warning-face hard to read because it is bold Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:20:52 +0000 Message-ID: <45AD6BE4.1060305@gnu.org> References: <45AD61F2.6080209@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168993282 9060 80.91.229.12 (17 Jan 2007 00:21:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 17 01:21:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H6yYD-0002d7-7s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:21:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6yYD-0006dx-Dg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6yY2-0006d7-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H6yY0-0006b6-8B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H6yY0-0006at-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail1.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H6yXz-0005js-4y; Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:20:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EBE536F9; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:20:58 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" In-Reply-To: <45AD61F2.6080209@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65249 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > Yes, it looks much better. Eli and Jason, do you use font smoothing? I > just use the default and I think that the fonts should look good by > default. Fonts look like they look. Emacs does not have any control over the fonts Microsoft chooses to ship with Windows. And I agree with Eli, the screenshot you sent looks absolutely fine. Perhaps your monitor is out of focus?