From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 50, Issue 7 Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:08:30 +0000 Message-ID: <459CB5FE.30904@gnu.org> References: <459BB893.9010106@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167898144 3670 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2007 08:09:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 04 09:09:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H2Nei-0004iR-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 09:08:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2Neh-0007rK-Ro for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:08:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2NeV-0007r5-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:08:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H2NeS-0007qk-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:08:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H2NeS-0007qh-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail1.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H2NeP-0002kS-KC; Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:08:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail1.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18D851A7B; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 08:08:36 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64740 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > I suggest that at least the above sentence must be removed, as it > incorrectly gives the designers of Windows credit for the CUA standard. > > Who did design that specification? > IBM, though a lot of the guidelines came from Apple's HIG from what I understand.