From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: National Language Support Functions Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:21:14 +0100 Message-ID: <459683EA.2040902@gmail.com> References: <458AB581.7090303@student.lu.se> <459536C5.4090503@gmail.com> <45957190.9030801@student.lu.se> <45957F23.8040409@gmail.com> <45958D3B.4060207@gmail.com> <45959540.407@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167492094 14623 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2006 15:21:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 30 16:21:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0g1c-0006yE-1v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:21:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0g1b-0000Gy-Gv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:21:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0g1O-0000G2-Lf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:21:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0g1N-0000FD-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:21:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0g1N-0000F2-GJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.212] (helo=ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1H0g1L-0001y8-3X; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 10:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:64291 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H0g1I-0004NF-6N; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:21:13 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0665-0, 2006-12-29), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1H0g1I-0004NF-6N. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1H0g1I-0004NF-6N 82eac07f611a0ae194efe618310ce831 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64492 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:51:36 +0100 >> From: "Juanma Barranquero" >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> >>> but it is hard for me to understand why it should be >>> scary to use a low level keyboard hook. >>> >> I looked at your low-level hook code once; it wasn't scary. It was >> just complex for little gain. >> > > When this issue was discussed, I explained why I thought it was a bad > idea; please re-read this message: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-07/msg00467.html > > and the discussion that followed. > Did not I explain why that argument is not valid here? If you take a look at the code you will see that very little will have to change to allow this hook.