From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: nt/makefile.w32-in Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:35:29 +0100 Message-ID: <458B1A41.6030401@student.lu.se> References: <458A71F9.2050709@gnu.org> <458AFA12.4010700@student.lu.se> <458B0F4C.90909@student.lu.se> <458B15E5.7040201@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1166744158 1640 80.91.229.10 (21 Dec 2006 23:35:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 22 00:35:55 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GxXS1-0000T5-QO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:35:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXS1-0005ce-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:35:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXRl-0005bd-Bx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXRj-0005b0-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GxXRj-0005ax-NG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.212] (helo=ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GxXRh-0005xW-Qt; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:35:30 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:62573 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GxXRf-0000rt-4V; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:35:27 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) Original-To: Jason Rumney In-Reply-To: <458B15E5.7040201@gnu.org> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0661-1, 2006-12-21), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GxXRf-0000rt-4V. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1GxXRf-0000rt-4V c753f181a3387e1529b265e59ba16589 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64080 Archived-At: Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman wrote: >> I guess you are pretty sure that this is the right thing to do. Why >> not do it now then? Problems that could occur now just affects people >> checking out code, but if we release it with the problem it can >> affect those users trying to build Emacs quite a long time afterwards. > > What problems? Noone has reported any problems have they? This is an > aesthetic change as far as I can see, so it is best left until after > the release in case it has unforeseen side effects. If we assume the make ports people use does not care about line endings, then yes. Otherwise no.