From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: problems starting windows compiled help files with start-process Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:28:37 +0100 Message-ID: <45704A25.5010105@student.lu.se> References: <87d5753f9o.fsf@hans.local.net> <456E3407.5000106@student.lu.se> <456E9231.5050603@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1164986993 4933 80.91.229.2 (1 Dec 2006 15:29:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, brakjoller@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 01 16:29:48 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqAJw-0002x1-OE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:29:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqAJv-0003mI-Ij for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:28:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqAJh-0003jw-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:28:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqAJg-0003id-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqAJg-0003iM-Jy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:28:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.76.149.212] (helo=ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GqAJd-0005eY-D7; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:28:41 -0500 Original-Received: from c83-254-145-24.bredband.comhem.se ([83.254.145.24]:60899 helo=[192.168.123.121]) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqAJa-0002ND-5v; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:28:39 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1GqAJa-0002ND-5v. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1GqAJa-0002ND-5v c81ec97e895e77c8b368e6b0c8219db0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63195 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:11:29 +0100 >> From: Lennart Borgman >> CC: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de, brakjoller@gmail.com, >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>>> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:29:43 +0100 >>>> From: Lennart Borgman >>>> Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, Emacs Devel , >>>> Mathias Dahl >>>> >>>> That is because no one has had the time to rewrite that part. >>>> >>>> Reading that part I also found that it is about running DOS processes on >>>> MS Windows. I suggest that we rename to to reflect this. >>> What version of which manual are you reading? In the CVS version (and >>> the one distributed with the pretest), the MS-Windows part _was_ >>> rewritten, and the node's name is "Windows processes". >> >> The CVS version. > > Then please explain what places did you want to be changed to talk > about Windows as opposed to DOS. I really think the rewrite you were > asking for was done already, but maybe I missed some places when I did > that. I think the original poster has explained now what he missed there. I would suggest adding that and pushing much of the current node into a subnode about DOS subprocesses. This material might still be valuable, but it is not that common to use DOS subprocesses any more I guess.