From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:33:49 +0000 Message-ID: <4560CDBD.3080308@gnu.org> References: <87slggjtbb.fsf@furball.mit.edu> <455F9024.8080000@student.lu.se> <17759.43936.82301.353794@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85irhbg6zx.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17760.11257.78362.216206@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85wt5reo3b.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17760.17309.553008.718144@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85slgfcy5v.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <45606E21.9030000@student.lu.se> <45609A48.2080905@gnu.org> <4560B581.3030201@gnu.org> <851wnzb1sz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1163972056 13223 80.91.229.2 (19 Nov 2006 21:34:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Lennart Borgman , Nick Roberts , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 19 22:34:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GluIj-00046O-KV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:34:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GluIj-0001C1-5E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GluIY-0001Bk-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:33:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GluIX-0001BM-5p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:33:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GluIX-0001BJ-44 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:33:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GluIV-0000Tq-HZ; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:33:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301375152D; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 21:33:54 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <851wnzb1sz.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:62497 Archived-At: David Kastrup wrote: > Jason Rumney writes: > >>> In the most important use case, we DO want to wait. >>> > > Why? Because most programs that launch an editor as a subprocess need to know when editing has finished.