From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ich@frank-schmitt.net: Build failure under Suse 10.0] Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:19:24 +0100 Message-ID: <454EFE1C.4070907@swipnet.se> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162804841 16453 80.91.229.2 (6 Nov 2006 09:20:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 06 10:20:39 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0eM-0005l6-Pp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:20:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0eM-0001Qe-8J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0dn-00017w-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:19:39 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0dl-000179-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:19:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0dl-000174-O1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:19:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [81.228.9.183] (helo=av8-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gh0dl-0005jB-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:19:37 -0500 Original-Received: by av8-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C6AC3381C9; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:19:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.102]) by av8-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5349381CF; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:19:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain (81-235-205-78-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.78]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D4437E4C; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 10:19:34 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) Original-To: Frank Schmitt In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61859 Archived-At: You have in /usr/local/include/gif_lib.h: typedef struct { int ByteCount; char *Bytes; } ExtensionBlock; i.e. no Function member. It may be a stray file from some older version. Please make sure it is the correct header file, in your previous post you said /usr/include/gif_lib.h had a Function member. Jan D. Frank Schmitt skrev: > Richard Stallman writes: > >> Has this been fixed? >> >> From: Frank Schmitt >> Subject: Build failure under Suse 10.0 >> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:53:40 +0100 >> >> Hello >> >> I get a build failure with current CVS-Head: >> >> gcc -c -D_BSD_SOURCE -Demacs -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DUSE_LUCID -I. -I/export/inverness/cvs/emacs/src -D_BSD_SOURCE -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/ >> include/alsa -g -O2 -Wno-pointer-sign image.c >> image.c: In function ?gif_load?: >> image.c:7874: error: ?struct ? has no member named ?Function? >> make[2]: *** [image.o] Error 1 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/export/inverness/cvs/emacs/src' >> make[1]: *** [bootstrap-build] Error 2 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/export/inverness/cvs/emacs' >> make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 > > No, I still get the same error with a fresh checkout of todays CVS > head. I also tried compiling under a fresh user account to prevent > strange settings of environment variables hindering compilation but this > didn't change anything, too. >