From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 12:39:57 +0000 Message-ID: <454DDB9D.5040604@gnu.org> References: <87lkn1tzav.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4543389E.3090006@gnu.org> <4543CFDF.1060605@gnu.org> <45448DB1.8080800@gnu.org> <454D12F7.3080109@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162730436 16088 80.91.229.2 (5 Nov 2006 12:40:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 05 13:40:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GghIU-0006qi-Ku for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 13:40:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GghIU-0001xe-59 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:40:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GghIH-0001wX-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:40:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GghIC-0001v7-Uu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:40:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GghIC-0001v4-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GghIA-0005qZ-Hu; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 07:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A33055FFB; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:40:01 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61816 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > That we already do: this is why DOC depends on temacs.exe. Once > temacs.exe is rebuilt, "make install" will rebuild DOC. > > But you seemed to say that this arrangement causes us to lag one step, > and I don't understand why. > It lags behind in the case where the user does not "make install" after every make. I'm not arguing with your desire to hold off on making any changes until after the release though.