From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:17:05 +0000 Message-ID: <45448DB1.8080800@gnu.org> References: <87lkn1tzav.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4543389E.3090006@gnu.org> <4543CFDF.1060605@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162120676 17930 80.91.229.2 (29 Oct 2006 11:17:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 29 12:17:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ge8fq-0007ox-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 12:17:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ge8fo-0001jJ-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:17:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ge8fT-0001ih-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:17:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ge8fR-0001he-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:17:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ge8fR-0001hb-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:17:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.106.33.237] (helo=outmail.freedom2surf.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Ge8fO-0008SQ-2l; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:17:26 -0500 Original-Received: from wanchan.jasonrumney.net (i-83-67-23-108.freedom2surf.net [83.67.23.108]) by outmail.freedom2surf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1BB54295; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:17:10 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from [10.0.0.27] (chiko.jasonrumney.net [10.0.0.27]) by wanchan.jasonrumney.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579E149; Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:17:10 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61333 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Do you have some sh.exe on your PATH, or did you use CMD? I think my > patch would not work with CMD, due to forward slashes in the > redirection. I think I'd replace that with some cp command. > There is no sh.exe in my path, so I think it would have used cmd.exe. Perhaps mingw32-make converted the path before passing to cmd.exe? But cp would be safer. >> But if temacs.exe is not needed to produce the DOC file, why do we >> depend on it in the first place? >> > > So that, whenever temacs.exe is rebuilt (meaning that some C file has > changed), DOC is regenerated by "make install". > Then wouldn't it be better to build DOC after temacs? Otherwise we lag behind by one build, since temacs does not get modified until after the DOC file is generated.