From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are and not called and ? Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:29:57 +0200 Message-ID: <44F7D365.7060200@student.lu.se> References: <44F7607B.6040902@student.lu.se> <44F7C067.2070607@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1157092240 16608 80.91.229.2 (1 Sep 2006 06:30:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 06:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 08:30:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJ2Xo-0005KH-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 08:30:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJ2Xo-0007IW-6N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:30:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GJ2Xb-0007Hd-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GJ2XZ-0007HK-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GJ2XZ-0007HH-Iv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.8.164] (helo=pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GJ2hM-0006Ns-B2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.075) id 44F2F2F70013587E; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:29:58 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-Reply-To: <44F7C067.2070607@student.lu.se> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59205 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman wrote: > The principle to have things as transparent as possible is a good one, > but so is to use understandable names for end users. > > What is needed is a translation from the internal symbol names to > physical keyboard key names in `single-key-description'. Such a > translation should of course be possible to turn off. > > Do you think this is a very big change? Does it disturb the > transparency very much? Ehum, you need the same kind of things for the input description too of course.