Hi Kim,

I have made quite a few changes since I last sent this to you. Richard 
proposed different wordings and some rework which I have done. Currently 
I think that Richard is satisfied with the patch. Michael has said it is 
ok for Viper. (But I have made some changes after that. However I asked 
about his opinion about the idea of telling about some of the more 
important clashes with Viper and I think he thought that was good.)

I have attached the version which I sent last time to Richard (with just 
the small change in wording that Kim proposed below). The new version 
lives in a file of its own, tutorial.el.

I am sorry for the confusion that it raises that you did not get this 
version before. I somehow thought you were not interested since I did 
not hear from you.


Kim F. Storm wrote:
> I don't see any problem with the things you have written about
> cua-mode as such.
>
> However, the statement "you have enabled cua-mode" may very
> well be false  (if someone is able to enable cua-mode, they
> are likely to be past tutorial state).  So maybe the text
> should be "cua-mode is enabled".
>   
I have changed it.
> I tried to enter the tutorial after enabling viper-mode,
> but I didn't see any information about VIPER in the help
> buffer...  so I don't know how to activate the stuff about
> vi in your patch...
>   
I have made that explicit now.
>
> In any case, I think that emacs should simply reject to run the
> tutorial if VIPER is enabled (or turn it off in the tutorial and NOT
> give the option to enable it in the tutorial).
>   
Viper is not enabled in the tutorial buffer by default. However I now 
offer the possibility to enable it so that the user can see the more 
important key clashes.

I think this is good for Viper users. Users who does not use Viper is 
not affected by this at all.

> BTW, the patch mixes two sets of changes ... for the key binding
> stuff and for running multiple tutorials at the same time.
>
> The latter part should IMO, never be installed -- it is just
> too obscure for normal users!
>   
There are some more changes too.

Can you please tell me what is wrong with beeing able to run a tutorial 
in for example German and another in English? Is that really obscure? 
(Please look at the version I attach here.)