From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Rumney Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs geometry Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:46:16 +0100 Message-ID: <44C72BD8.1030608@gnu.org> References: <44C69619.6060304@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153903626 3140 80.91.229.2 (26 Jul 2006 08:47:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:47:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 26 10:47:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5f2f-0002Bs-Tf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:46:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5f2e-0005QL-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5f2P-0005Pq-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:46:41 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G5f2N-0005Pc-Ix for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:46:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G5f2N-0005PZ-DG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:46:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.86.207.50] (helo=exchange.integrasp.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G5f3s-0000sc-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:48:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.111.61] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exchange.integrasp.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id NMA810AW; Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:38:06 +0100 Original-Received: from 192.168.111.61 ([192.168.111.61] helo=[192.168.111.61]) by ASSP-nospam; 26 Jul 2006 09:38:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 Original-To: Sridhar Boovaraghavan In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57653 Archived-At: Sridhar Boovaraghavan wrote: > I just want to acknowledge Drew for taking up the cudgels on my behalf here. In > these posts he has articulated what I feel. To reiterate: > > 1. I feel that the new offsetting frame behavior to be a bug. > On the contrary, it is now consistent with what happens on X if no position is explicitly supplied by the user - the window manager is left to position the frame. The previous behavior of positioning the frame at (0, 0), while it has been around for a long time, was a bug, and since it produces bad results when the taskbar is at the top of the screen, it was appropriate to fix the bug.