From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: jit lock sit-for provokes redisplay provokes imenu Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:55:40 +0200 Message-ID: <44C32B7C.4050608@gmx.at> References: <81CCA6588E60BB42BE68BD029ED4826008838221@wimex2.wim.midas-kapiti.com> <44C0EA68.40105@gmx.at> <44C1EE07.3080502@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153641330 9438 80.91.229.2 (23 Jul 2006 07:55:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: simon.marshall@misys.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 23 09:55:28 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4YoA-0007rx-Pe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:55:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4YoA-0006HQ-Aa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:55:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G4Ynv-0006Ga-5X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:55:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G4Yns-0006GO-NG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:55:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4Yns-0006GL-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.21] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G4Yog-0007Pw-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:55:59 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2006 07:55:06 -0000 Original-Received: from N715P010.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.33.74]) [62.47.33.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 23 Jul 2006 09:55:06 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en Original-To: martin rudalics In-Reply-To: <44C1EE07.3080502@gmx.at> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57497 Archived-At: > > Rather than increment CHARS_MODIFF separately, > > it should copy the value from MODIFF. > > That way, values of CHARS_MODIFF will be comparable with values > > that were copied from MODIFF. > > Yes, but it will deprive you of eventually introducing a variable > SAVE_CHARS_MODIFF and tell whether an insertion/deletion occurred > since the last save because CHARS_MODIFF > SAVE_CHARS_MODIFF. Rereading this I think that there should not be any problem. There's also no reasonable use of such a variable I can think of. Hence, please ignore this part of the message.