From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [eugene@ikz.ru: mouse-drag-vertical-line or mouse-drag-mode-line failed with complex window split] Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:42:40 +0200 Message-ID: <44910F70.5080105@gmx.at> References: <87bqsz1oax.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <44900219.3030504@gmx.at> <17552.43223.885764.145621@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1150357341 1921 80.91.229.2 (15 Jun 2006 07:42:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:42:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Eugene Vlasov , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 15 09:42:18 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqmTs-0004eV-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 09:41:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqmTs-00087o-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:41:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FqmTc-00087c-7O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:41:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FqmTa-00087P-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:41:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FqmTa-00087M-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:41:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.21] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Fqmcv-0000gU-Hu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2006 07:41:12 -0000 Original-Received: from N917P015.adsl.highway.telekom.at (EHLO [62.47.58.143]) [62.47.58.143] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 15 Jun 2006 09:41:12 +0200 X-Authenticated: #14592706 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en Original-To: Nick Roberts In-Reply-To: <17552.43223.885764.145621@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55910 Archived-At: > This looks like a contived window arrangement. Do you actually need this > arrangement or were you just testing extreme situations? I think we should > focus on bugs that are encountered in normal use, otherwise we really will be > here for eternity. In your example, you can still move the mode line by > selecting it from the window to the right. I don't need this but I frequently need the arrangement described in my earlier mail on this subject. Happily that has been resolved. Anyway, we are talking about a regression here because all these worked with pre-April releases. I contributed mine only to give further clues on how to reproduce the bug and am confident that my case automatically disappears as soon as Evgeni's problem has been resolved.