unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: C-h K and C-h F in the Help menu
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 09:38:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44701909.2050601@student.lu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uac9cxcui.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 23:19:02 +0200
>> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>
>> CC:  emacs-devel@gnu.org
>>
>> I recently got some comments about the help menu in CVS Emacs from a 
>> long term Emacs user and fan (+15 y usage). One of the comments were 
>> that there are too many things in the help menu.
>>     
>
> For some value of ``too many'': we have 17 entries there.  Why is this
> bad?  Each entry can be useful in specific situations.
>   
It is a good question. As I understand it the complaints was from a user 
interface view. Such a view is a mixture of logical and psychological 
matters. Neither a logical or a psychological argument is then entirely 
useful on its own even if they on their own are completely valid.

At first sight one might think that the time to find something in a menu 
is proportional to the length of the menu. I think however that the time 
required rises much faster, but I have not read any research about this. 
As I said before one of the factors is probably the short term memory 
span. This means that clear grouping with horizontal lines will probably 
help (as soon as the user understands the grouping). In the process of 
trying to grasp the grouping it seems to me that there should be a big 
advantage in fewer items.

Submenus will reduce the number of items even if there is only two 
subitems and I believe that this will be helpful for the reasons I have 
tried to outline above.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-21  7:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-20 20:32 C-h K and C-h F in the Help menu Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-20 21:19 ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-20 21:38   ` David Kastrup
2006-05-20 21:54     ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-20 22:10       ` David Kastrup
2006-05-20 22:28         ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-20 22:48           ` David Kastrup
2006-05-20 23:00             ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-20 23:08               ` David Kastrup
2006-05-20 23:16                 ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-20 23:20                   ` David Kastrup
2006-05-21  3:35                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-21  3:36                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-21  9:31             ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2006-05-21  3:38           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-20 22:44         ` Mathias Dahl
2006-05-20 22:56           ` David Kastrup
2006-05-20 23:02             ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-20 23:09               ` David Kastrup
2006-05-20 23:13                 ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-20 23:22                   ` David Kastrup
2006-05-21  9:57             ` Mathias Dahl
2006-05-21 10:11               ` David Kastrup
2006-05-21 10:13               ` Andreas Schwab
2006-05-21 18:48               ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-21  3:43       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-22  2:38         ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-22  2:56           ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-05-22  3:36             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-22 20:36             ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-22  8:57           ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-21  4:27     ` Juri Linkov
2006-05-21  3:42   ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-21  7:38     ` Lennart Borgman [this message]
2006-05-21 18:46       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-21 21:04       ` Alan Mackenzie
2006-05-21 23:13         ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-22 15:12           ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-22 16:53             ` Drew Adams
2006-05-22 21:49               ` Lennart Borgman
2006-05-22 18:39             ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-23  0:42               ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-23  3:21                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-22  3:23         ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-05-21 17:08   ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-21 17:08   ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-21  4:27 ` Juri Linkov
2006-05-21 17:08 ` Richard Stallman
2006-05-26 20:02   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44701909.2050601@student.lu.se \
    --to=lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).