From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Num_Lock under solaris 5.8 Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 12:18:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4464610D.608@swipnet.se> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147429178 9406 80.91.229.2 (12 May 2006 10:19:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 10:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 12 12:19:36 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeUkB-0002qO-0v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:19:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeUk9-0005bP-B2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FeUjy-0005Z6-Uh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FeUju-0005U9-7W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:19:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FeUju-0005To-3p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.9.180] (helo=av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FeUlc-00045W-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 06:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: by av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BFA0F37F44; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:19:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.102]) by av6-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B108E37EBE; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:19:17 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from coolsville.localdomain (81-235-205-204-no59.tbcn.telia.com [81.235.205.204]) by smtp3-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CB137E4D; Fri, 12 May 2006 12:19:17 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) Original-To: Klaus Zeitler In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54311 Archived-At: Klaus Zeitler skrev: > My emacs doesn't seem to recognize the Num_Lock key (xkeycaps does). > Does this work for anybody else? Any hints what I should check? > My guess it's somewhere around line 6364 in xterm.c > > #ifdef XK_Num_Lock > || ((unsigned)(orig_keysym) == XK_Num_Lock) > #endif > Start xev (you may have to get it from somewhere) and press Num_Lock and see what keysym it generates. Jan D.