From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: default-buffer-file-coding-system on w32 is not -dos Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 00:29:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4436E7CD.9010504@student.lu.se> References: <4436B78D.40702@student.lu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144449007 12770 80.91.229.2 (7 Apr 2006 22:30:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 22:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 08 00:30:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRzSn-0003kO-SL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 00:29:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRzSm-00059u-T2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRzSa-00059p-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:29:44 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRzSZ-00059c-Bp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:29:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRzSZ-00059Z-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:29:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [81.228.8.164] (helo=pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FRzWb-0006Qv-RU; Fri, 07 Apr 2006 18:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [192.168.123.121] (83.249.218.244) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.070) id 4430FC02001540EE; Sat, 8 Apr 2006 00:29:38 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52520 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Is that really 2004-04-06 (i.e. 2 years ago)? Or is this yesterday's > CVS? > Sorry, typo. 2006-04-06. > >> It says "iso-latin-1". I also tried CVS Emacs from 2006-03-20 >> (unpatched). It says the same. >> > > Does that mean that, for you, the current CVS code uses > iso-latin-1-dos for newly-created files? Or are you saying that both > these versions use Unix-style EOLs? Because that's what's really > important: whether the default is to create DOS- or Unix-style line > endings; the value of buffer-file-coding-system is just the symptom. > So please tell me whether on your machine new files are created DOS or > Unix style. 1) The indicator on the mode line says ":" when creating the file. 2) The created file as Unix-style line endings 3) When restarting Emacs -Q and opening the file again the mode line says "(Unix)"